This is one of the most famous and definitely one of the most controversial out-of-Mormonism stories. The reasons for the latter are various: the form, the content, the author and the people involved: true Mormon royalty. Martha Beck’s father[1] was one of the most influential and respected figures in the LDS Church. The book, published only a couple of weeks after his death, shook not only the Mormon community.
Martha and her husband were both enjoying their scholarship at liberal Harvard, but when their son Adam was born with Down Syndrome they decided to come back to their Utah homeland. According to Mormon teachings, the sweetest spirits occupy the frailest bodies and handicapped people are treated kindly and specially as “the chosen ones”.
The title of the book is all wrong. Leaving the Saints did eventually happen, when both Martha and her husband resigned after the excommunication of the September Six[2], but overall the Mormons aren’t more than a prop in this memoir. There are weirdos in a creepy underwear who can be made fun of because of their naivety and lack of Harvard experience and whose obligation is to treat Adam well. Every mother would do anything for the wellbeing of her child, but Martha’s purely utilitarian attitude toward people should in no way be disregarded. Her disrespect to her old/new community is portrayed in many examples, for instance, that she decides to make home-made jam (and complains what a boring task it is) like a good Mormon wife should, but doesn’t attend the boring church. There are many “dos” and “don’ts” in the LDS community and appearances do matter, but church service is still considered more important than home-made fruit products.
The true core of this book is the story about Martha and her father. It starts like a thriller, with the ninety years old Nibley being brought to a motel room, where Martha starts her interrogation. The whole conversation is recorded and there are spies hiding in the closets. I understand a fantasy of living a James-Bondlike adventure at least once, but applying such measures against a man on his deathbed is laughable. The reasons for those we learn quite soon, because soon after moving back to Utah Martha starts having visions. True visions, with golden spheres leaving someone’s body, voices and appearances. Her need to look spiritual and close to God made her actually look ridiculous. A description of a warm feeling or conviction of God’s presence would have worked much better, but any Mormon pheasant can declare that and Martha is oh-so-special. Finally the visions start having a plot and they apparently turn out to be repressed memories when her father abused her in her childhood. This is what the man was supposed to confess in the motel room full of spies. As a punishment for his denial this book was written, to make publish both the alleged abuse and to let people know, that Nibley’s abundant literary work was pure fiction and the footnotes he was famous of not based on any source but invented.
Only two people know with certainty what happened, Martha and the late Nibley. As was to be expected, it was the latter that received more posthumous support. Even the divided Nibley family stood suddenly united denying the accusations.[3] There is no chance to know what truly happened and I am not going to guess, having only this not really objective book as a basis. Sexual abuse is one of the worst things that can happen to anyone and I truly wish it never happened to anyone. I am in no way accusing Martha of lying, but there are indeed issues with her credibility. And if someone is not trustworthy in small things, it’s not possible not to doubt in the big ones.
First there are the mentioned visions. Second, in order to present Mormons as mindless imbecilic sheep who lack reasoning capabilities, she invents or conveniently modifies claims and events so that they fit her story. The need for drama is such, that even the Danites reappeared after a hundred years underground to threaten Martha and only Martha. Even her (now ex) husband, portrayed in this book perfect like Moroni incarnated, bashes the lies without mercy.[4] Third, a person who wrote a whole book treating homosexuality as compulsive behavior like bulimia[5] and currently lives in a homosexual relationship herself doesn’t seem as the most consistent and trustworthy.
Overall, it’s an exhausting book. Pseudo-witty gags about how Mormon women need to ask their husband if they can get a haircut, Mormon men wearing socks because hair on legs is an extension of pubic hair that and can’t be shown under any circumstances or putting drinking coffee at the same level as murder combined with somber accusation of child rape don’t go together. Add to this Martha’s haughtiness and feeling of superiority and the result is unbearable. There are many out-of-religion memoirs, most of them very bitter and vindictive, but none has left such a horrible aftertaste after the lecture.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Nibley
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_Six
[3] http://www.deseretnews.com/article/600109810/Nibley-siblings-outraged-over-sisters-book.html?pg=all
[4] http://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/R2CIH77GM4PVJS/ref=cm_cr_pr_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=0307335992
[5] http://www.amazon.com/Breaking-Compulsive-Behavior-Martha-Nibley/dp/0875792901/ref=asap_bc?ie=UTF8
=asap_bc?ie=UTF8